Difference between revisions of "128-spring-2013/Assignment5"
From CCRMA Wiki
(→Part 1: evaluation of your group's performance) |
(→Part 2: evaluation of the concert as a whole) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Critically reflect on the quality of the concert as a whole. You may write this part in the form of a concert review (from an audience perspective), or write up first-person reflections (similar to what you did for Part 1). | Critically reflect on the quality of the concert as a whole. You may write this part in the form of a concert review (from an audience perspective), or write up first-person reflections (similar to what you did for Part 1). | ||
| − | The following questions should help you get started | + | The following questions should help you get started: |
* Was the concert what you anticipated? If not, how did it differ from your expectations? | * Was the concert what you anticipated? If not, how did it differ from your expectations? | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* Do you think that the works presented in the concert were diverse in terms of musical aesthetics and interaction designs? If not, what more do you wish you had seen/ heard? | * Do you think that the works presented in the concert were diverse in terms of musical aesthetics and interaction designs? If not, what more do you wish you had seen/ heard? | ||
* What was your least favorite part about the concert? | * What was your least favorite part about the concert? | ||
| − | * Did the audience seem engaged? What elements of performance do you think encourage/ motivate them to be more engaged? | + | * Did the audience seem engaged? What elements of performance do you think encourage/ motivate them to be more engaged? |
== Submission Details == | == Submission Details == | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 29 April 2013
Contents
Overview: SLOrktastic reflections
This assignment asks you to reflect on the SLOrktastic Chamber Music Concert, not only on your group's performance, but also on the quality of the concert as a whole.
Instructions
Part 1: evaluation of your group's performance
Critically evaluate your group's performance. You may focus on just a few (or all) of the following thought questions:
- How do you feel about your group's performance at SLOrktastic? In what areas was it successful/ unsuccessful?
- Were there any "surprises" during the performance that you did not anticipate during rehearsals? If so, how did you deal with these surprises on the spot?
- What was the most challenging part in preparing for the concert with your group?
- If given another change to perform again with your group at a similar setting, what would you do differently?
- If you'd like, acknowledge any individual in your group that you think went above and beyond in preparing for the concert.
Part 2: evaluation of the concert as a whole
Critically reflect on the quality of the concert as a whole. You may write this part in the form of a concert review (from an audience perspective), or write up first-person reflections (similar to what you did for Part 1).
The following questions should help you get started:
- Was the concert what you anticipated? If not, how did it differ from your expectations?
- How was the overall quality of presentation? Do you think the class seemed "professional" in presenting the works? Were the transitions between pieces made smoothly?
- What was your favorite piece, other than your own? ;) What was especially attractive about this piece?
- Do you think that the works presented in the concert were diverse in terms of musical aesthetics and interaction designs? If not, what more do you wish you had seen/ heard?
- What was your least favorite part about the concert?
- Did the audience seem engaged? What elements of performance do you think encourage/ motivate them to be more engaged?
Submission Details
- Due date: May 7 (Tue) 23:59
- Your write-up should be about 2 pages in length, in PDF or DOC format
- Write-up should be emailed to all of the teaching staff: {jieun5, spencer, kwerner} @ ccrma
- Include "SLOrk Assignment 5" in the email subject.
- We'll have a class discussion on May 8 based on your response.
